Sensitivity of Crossflow to Parametric Study of Complete Pressure Distribution Model for Horizontal Well in a Two-Layered Bounded Extended Reservoir

Authors

  • M. C Ogbue Delta State University, Abraka, Oleh Campus Author

Keywords:

Two-layered reservoir, horizontal well, crossflow, parametric study, unlimited number of flow regimes, pressure distribution model

Abstract

A crossflow interface acts as a constant pressure external boundary. It provides recharge of energy within a layer by fluid influx from another layer. The extent of recharge is determined by the degree of crossflow. Since there is no direct way to determine the degree of crossflow at the scale of a reservoir, parameters that control the behavior of crossflow were used to study its effect on pressure responses. This article is aimed at determining the sensitivity of crossflow to changes in the values of the parameters that control its performance in a two-layered bounded reservoir. Conceptual, physical, and mathematical models were sequentially developed for a horizontal well in a two-layered bounded reservoir with a crossflow interface. A mathematical model for the crossflow interface was derived as a function of fluid properties, reservoir properties, and real time. Quantifying parameters were defined as degree of crossflow, D, and ease of crossflow, E. Various configurations of the two-layered reservoir, resulting in eighteen sets of data, were used to study behaviour of Crossflow. From the results obtained, the degree of crossflow increases as the dimensionless pressure reduces. As ease of crossflow increases, so also does the rate of decline in pressure derivative. Degree of crossflow varies directly as dimensionless well standoff, dimensionless well radius, and dimensionless well length. The degree of crossflow varies inversely as the time normalization factor, dimensionless reservoir width, and dimensionless reservoir length. However, the degree of crossflow is not affected by reservoir thickness and interlayer mobility ratio. Ease of crossflow varies directly as interlayer mobility ratio, dimensionless well length, and dimensionless well radius but inversely as dimensionless well standoff, dimensionless reservoir length, and dimensionless reservoir width. But ease of crossflow is not affected by reservoir thickness. It was observed that optimum oil production and effective reservoir management can be achieved if both layers are produced from the layer with higher mobility. It is therefore recommendable as the best completion strategy for a layered reservoir with a crossflow interface to produce both layers from the layer with higher mobility.

Author Biography

  • M. C Ogbue, Delta State University, Abraka, Oleh Campus

    Department of Petroleum Engineering, 

    Delta State University, Abraka, Oleh Campus

References

Bourdet D. (1985). “Pressure behaviour of layered reservoir with crossflow”. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE Paper No. 13628, presented at the 1985 Annual California Regional Meeting in Bakers, CA., Mar. 27 – 29.

Russel D. G. and Prats M. (1962). “Practical aspects of interlayer crossflow”. Journal of Petroleum Technology. Pp 589 - 594. Reprint Series No. 9- “Pressure Analysis Methods”, Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, Dallas (1967). Pg. 120 -125.

Du K-F. and Stewart G. (1992). “Transient pressure response of horizontal well in layered and naturally fractured reservoirs with Dual-porosity behaviour. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 24682. Pg. 227 – 240.

Owolabi A. F., Olafuyi O. A., Adewole E. S. (2012). “Pressure distribution in a layered reservoir with gas cap and bottom water”. Nigerian Journal of Technology (NIJOTECH), Vol. 31, No. 2, July. Pg. 189 – 198.

Adewole E. S., Rai B. M. and Audu T. O. K. (2003). “Pressure distribution in a layered reservoir with lateral wells. Journal for Nigerian Association of Mathematical Physics. Vol. 7. Pg. 135 – 146.

Kuchuk, F.J and Habashy T. (1996). ‘Pressure behavior of Horizontal Wells in Multilayer Reservoirs with Crossflow’ SPE formation Evaluation, March. Pg 55-64

Lu J., Rahman M. M., Yang E., Alhamami M. T., Zhong H (2021). “Pressure transient behavior in a multilayer reservoir with formation crossflow”. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. Volume 208, Part B, January https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109376.

Ehlig-Economides, C.A., and Joseph, J.A. (1995). “A New Test for Determination of Individual Layer Properties in a Multilayered Reservoir”. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE Paper No. 14167, Presented at 1985 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Las Vegas, NV., Sept. 22-25.

Oloro J., Adewole E.S.And Olafuyi O.A., (2012). “Pressure Distribution of Horizontal Wells in a Layered Reservoir with Simultaneous Gas Cap and Bottom Water Drives”. American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER). Vol. 3, Issue – 12. Pg 41-53

Viana I., Bela R. V., Pesco S., Barreto A. Junior, (2022). “An analytical model for pressure behavior in multilayered radially composite reservoir with formation crossflow”. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-022-01460-x

Wang J., Wang X., Dong W.. “Rate decline curves analysis of multiple-fractured horizontal wells in heterogeneous reservoirs”. Journal of Hydrology. Volume 553, October 2017, Pages 527-539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.08.024

Odeh A. S. and Babu D.K. (1990), “Transient Flow Behavior of Horizontal Wells: Pressure Drawdown and Buildup Analysis” SPE Formation Evaluation, March, Pg 10-14.

A1-Rbeawi S. and Tiab D. (2013), “Transient Pressure of Horizontal Wells in a Multi-Boundary System’ American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER), Volume 2, Issue 4. Pg 44-66.

Chu H., Liao X., Chen Z., Zhao X., Liu W., Dong P. (2019). “Transient pressure analysis of a horizontal well with multiple, arbitrarily shaped horizontal fractures”. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering journal.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.06.003

Gringarten A.C., and Ramey H.J. Jr, (1973). “The use of Source and Green’s Functions in solving Unsteady-flow Problems in Reservoirs”. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal. Vol. 13, Pg.285-296.

Shahrian E., and Masihi M. (2021) Analysis of well testing results for single phase flow in reservoirs with percolation structure. Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles 76, 15 (2021). https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2020092.

Ogbue, M. C. and Adewole, E. S. (2013).’Theoretical Investigation of Factors Affecting Water Breakthrough Time in a Horizontal Well Subject to Bottom Water Drive’. Trans Tech Publications Inc. Material Science & Engineering, Switzerland, vol. 824, page 394-400.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-23

Issue

Section

CJCEIB Volume 1 Issue 2