Methodological, Ontological and Epistemological Relevance of Paradigms in Sociological Analysis and Research Development
Keywords:
Epistemology, Ontology, Paradigm, Research Development, Sociological TheoryAbstract
Research paradigms are the basic belief systems or world views that guide the investigator not only in the choices of methods but in ontologically and epistemologically fundamental ways. Research generally is a process of finding out the answers to problems or the process of arriving at dependable solutions to problems through the planned and systematic collection, analysis and interpretation of data. Research methods and data form only part of the complex process of sociological research. In a research process the investigator is not only concerned with the appropriate methodology to be adopted in the consummation of the research, he also seeks the appropriate already existing theories or a set of theories to base the analysis of the research. It is these theories and their implied methodological approaches that constitute a research paradigm. The major import or primary focus of this paper, therefore, is to identify and discuss the relevance and purposes of paradigms in sociological research in relation with their methodological, ontological and epistemological implications. The study adopted the qualitative method of data collection and analysis, while the theory of knowledge formed its theoretical framework. From these analyses the following conclusions were reached: that as world views or belief systems, research paradigms enable the investigator in sociological research situate his work in its proper context; and that by knowing the specific research paradigms,the investigator will be able to determine, abinitio that it is a study in functionalism.
References
Abrahamson, M. (2001). “Functional conflict and nonfunctional theories”.In George Ritzer and Barry Smart (eds).Hand book of social theory. Sage.
Adelola, I.O. (1986). Introduction to sociology. Evans Brothers Publishers Ltd.
Afansyev, V.G. (1963). Marxist philosophy.Progress Publishers.
Aja, A. (1998). Fundamentals of modern political economy and international economic relations... changing with the times: Data-Globe.
Aja, A. (1997).Theory and practice of Marxism in a world in transition,Willyrose and Appleseed. Publishing Coy.
Atkinson, P. (1988). Enthnomethodology: A critical review. Annual Review of Sociology, 14:441-465.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspectives and methods. Prentice –Hall Incorporated .
Chafetz, J.S. (2004). “Bridging feminist theory and research methodology”. Journal of Family Issues. 25(7): 963-977.
Coser.L. A & Rosenberg, B. (1969). Sociological theory: A book of readings (3rd, ed.).
Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (1998). Hand book of qualitative research. Sage.
Durkheim, E. (1938).The rules of sociological methods. The Free Press.
Emerson, R; Ferris, K; and Gardener, C. (1998). “On being stocked” Social Problems 45(3): 289-314.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in enthnomethodology. Prentice-Hall.
Gouldner,A.W. (1971). The coming crisis of western sociology. Heinemann.
Haralambos, M. and Holborn, R.. (2013). Sociology: Themes and perspectives. University Tutorial Press Ltd.
Haralambos, M. with Heald, R.M. (1980). Sociology: Themes and perspectives. Richard Clay, the Chaucer Press Ltd.
Hess, S.G. (1988). Sociology: MacMillan Pub. Press
Howard, M. and King, J.E. (2005). Political economy. In George Ritzer(ed). Encyclopedia of social theory. Sage.
Lofland, J, & Lofland, L.H. (1995).Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. (3rd ed). Wadsworth.
Neuman, W.L. (1998). “Negotiated meanings and state transformation: The trust issues in the progressive era”. Social Problems 45(3): 315-35.
Parsons, T. (1964).Essay in sociological theory: Free Press.
Parsons, T. & Shils E.A. (1952). Toward a general theory of action. Harvard University Press.
Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery, In D.W. Hamlyn. (1970). The theory of knowledge: The Macmillan Press Ltd.
Ragin, C.C & Howard, S.B. (1992). What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. Cambridge University Press.
Scriven, M. (1972).Science in international encyclopedia of the social science, ed by David Sills. The Macmillan Company and the Free Press, Vol. 13, 74-91.
Sills, D.L. (1972).International encyclopedia of the social science. The Macmillan Company and Free Press.
Silverman, D. (1993). Interpreting qualitative data methods for analyzing talks, text and interaction. Sage.
Silverman, D. (1999). Doing qualitative research: A practical hand book. Sage.
Simmel, G. (1950). The Sociology of George Simmel. The Free Press.
Steward, E.W. (1981). Sociology: The human science (3rded). McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1994). “Grounded theory methodology: An overview”. Sage.
Thompson, J.L. (1982). Sociology made simple: London Made Simple Books, Heinemann.
Timasheff, N. (1967). Sociological theory: Its nature and growth. Random House.
Zimmerman, D.H, & Wieder, D.L. (1971). Enthnomethodology and the problem of order, inDouglas.