Adolescents Perceived Parenting And Smartphone Addiction As Predictors Of Cyberbullying

Authors

  • Solomon A Agu Author
  • Arinze M Eze Author
  • Chinenye Valentina Marire-Nwankwo Author

Keywords:

Parenting, Smartphone, Cyberbullying, Addiction, Adolescents

Abstract

The study investigated Adolescents perceived parenting and smart phone addiction as predictors of cyber bullying. A recent study found that 26.5% of adolescents had perpetrated cyber bullying (Kim, 2023). Positive parenting plays an important role in the development of children's psychological and behavioural control, parent–child communication, and encourages moderation in the use of smart phones by adolescents (Kim, 2023; Lee, &  Mun, 2022). A total of 306 male participants comprising 155 females and 151 males drawn from the population frame of Adolescent Students of Day Secondary Independence Layout (N = 108, 35%); Army Day Secondary School Awkunanaw (N = 102, 33%) and Uwani Secondary School (N = 98, 31%). The age ranges of the participants were between 13years and 17years while M = 15.31 and SD = .99. Mixed sampling technique (systematic, purposive, simple random) was used to select the participants. A 24-item Korean Parents as Social Context Questionnaire (PSCQ); Smartphone Addiction Scale-Short Version (SAS-SV) and The Cyber bullying in Social Media Scale (CSMS) English Version were used as instruments in the study.  Correlation design was adopted while Hierarchical Multiple Regression and Moderated Multiple Regression were used to analyze the data. Results revealed that perceived parenting (Warmth, Structure, Autonomy Support, Rejection, Chaos, Coercion) were entered. Warmth (β = -.24, t = -6.37, at P < .01); Structure (β = -.37, t = -9.84, at P < .01) Rejection (β = .38, t = 4.17, at P < .01); Chaos (β = .20, t = 2.42, at P < .05) and Coercion (β = .20, t = 4.35, at P < .01)  dimensions of perceived parenting predicted cyber bullying while Autonomy Support (β = -.06, t = -1.37, at P >  .05) did not predict cyber bullying. Also, the result revealed that Smartphone is a significant predictor of cyber bullying (β = .30, t = 6.52, at P < .01). From the results it was clear that both perceived parenting styles and smart phone addition are implicated in cyber bullying among adolescents.

Author Biographies

  • Solomon A Agu

    Department of Psychology, Enugu State University of Science and Technology

  • Arinze M Eze

    Department of Psychology, Enugu State University of Science and Technology

  • Chinenye Valentina Marire-Nwankwo

    Department of Psychology, Caritas University Enugu

References

Achuthan, K. et al. (2022). “Theoretical Perspectives of Parental Influence on Adolescent Cyber Behaviour: A Bi-National Instagram-Based Study.” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 11.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behaviour. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

Aviv, W. & Kristiana, S. (2022). Editorial: Excessive and problematic smartphone usage. Front Psychiatry. 13: 972613.

Bandura, A. (1963). Social learning and personality development. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Baumann, S. et al. (2022). “Perpetrators and Victims of Cyberbullying among Youth with Conduct Disorder.” European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 32, no. 9.

Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss: Volume I. Attachment. New York: Basic Books

.

Dehue, F., et al. (2012). “Cyberbullying and Traditional Bullying in Relation with Adolescents’ Perception of Parenting.” Journal of Cyber Therapy and Rehabilitation, vol. 5, no. 1, 2012, pp. 25–33.

Dehue, F., et al. (2012). “Cyberbullying and Traditional Bullying in Relation with Adolescents’ Perception of Parenting.” Journal of Cyber Therapy and Rehabilitation, vol. 5, no. 1, 2012, pp. 25–33.

Demirci, K., Orhan, H., Demirdas, A., Akpinar, A., & Sert, H. (2014). Validity and reliability of the Turkish Version of the Smartphone Addiction Scale in a younger population. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni-Bulletin of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 24(3):226–34.

Ensiyeh, N. et al. (2023). “The Mediating Role of Parenting Styles in the Relationship between Family Adaptability and Cohesion and Cyberbullying in Adolescents.” International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction, vol. 12, no. 3.

Fousiani, K. et al. (2016). “Perceived Parenting and Adolescent Cyber-Bullying: Examining the Intervening Role of Autonomy and Relatedness Need Satisfaction, Empathic Concern and Recognition of Humanness.” Journal of Child and Family Studies, vol. 25, no. 7.

Garaigordobil, M. & Raúl, N. (2022). “Parenting Styles and Self-Esteem in Adolescent Cybervictims and Cyberaggressors: Self-Esteem as a Mediator Variable.” Children, 9, no. 12.

Gohal, G. (2023). “Prevalence and Related Risks of Cyberbullying and Its Effects on Adolescent.” BMC Psychiatry, vol. 23, no. 1.

Jessor, R. (1991). Problem behaviour theory: A half-century of research. In Advances in Adolescent Development (pp. 1-36). New York: Wiley.

Ji, H. K., Hye, Y. S., & Gye, H. J. (2023). Relationship between positive parenting and cyberbullying perpetration among adolescents: role of self-esteem and smartphone addiction. Front. Psychol., Sec. Positive Psychology, 14.

Kerr, M. E., & Bowen, M. (1981). Family systems theory and therapy. In A. Gurman & D. P. Kniskem (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy (pp. 1-25). New York: Brunner/Mazel.

Kim, J. H., Song, H. Y., & Jung, G. H. (2023). Relationship between positive parenting and cyberbullying perpetration among adolescents: role of self-esteem and smartphone addiction. Front. Psychol, Volume 14 – 2023.

Kwon, M., Kim, D-J, Cho, H., Yang, S. (2013). The smartphone addiction scale: development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PloS one. 2013;8(12):e83558.

Lee, S., & Mun, B. (2022). How does perceived parental rejection influence cyberbullying by children? A serial mediation model of children’s depression and smartphone addiction. The Social Science Journal. DOI: 10.1080/03623319.2022.2070826

Lees, R. (2024). “Smartphone Scenes: Teen Clicks and Parental Tricks.” Bolt Chat AI, www.boltchatai.com/smartphone-scenes-teen-clicks-and-parental-tricks/. Accessed 9 Oct. 2024.

Lingfei, C. (2023).What Can Parents Do with Cyberbullying Among Adolescents? International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 13, No. 4.

Lopez-Fernandez, O. (2017). Short version of the Smartphone Addiction Scale adapted to Spanish and French: Towards a cross-cultural research in problematic mobile phone use. Addictive behaviours, 64:275–80.

Lumei, T., Lu, L., & Nan, S. (2018). Parent–Child Relationships and Resilience Among Chinese Adolescents: The Mediating Role of Self-Esteem. Front. Psychol., Sec. Personality and Social Psychology, 9.

Media, P. A. (2024). “Cyberbullying: One in Six Teenagers Report Harassment Online.” Www.bbc.com, 27 Mar. 2024, www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-68667030

.

Najjari et al. (2023). “The Mediating Role of Parenting Styles in the Relationship between Family Adaptability and Cohesion and Cyberbullying in Adolescents.” International Journal of High Risk Behaviours and Addiction, vol. 12, no. 3.

Nixon, C. (2014). “Current Perspectives: The Impact of Cyberbullying on Adolescent Health.” Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, vol. 5, no. 5.

Rocky, M. & Laxmi, G. (2022).Cyberbullying and its Relationship with Smartphone Addiction Mangal Research Journal. 3, pp: 73-82.

Yue, H., Yue, X., Zhang, X., Liu, B., & Bao, H. (2022). Exploring the relationship between social exclusion and smartphone addiction: The mediating roles of loneliness and self-control. Frontiers in Psychology, 13:1–10.

Yue, H., Zhang, X., Sun, J., Liu, M., & Bao, H. (2021). The relationships between negative emotions and latent classes of smartphone addiction. PloS one, 16(3):e0248555.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-02

Issue

Section

CJPBS Volume 2 Issue 2

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.